TP8 LP Maria Andrea Cabrera Aquino
Upper intermediate level
Description
Materials
Main Aims
-
To enable students to understand and accurately use past modals of deduction (must have / might have / could have / can’t have) to express degrees of certainty about past events, using the context of a mysterious disappearance.
Subsidiary Aims
-
To develop students’ listening skills for gist and detail through a short narrative. To provide students with fluency practice by discussing possible explanations and forming logical deductions about the story. To raise students’ awareness of pronunciation features, including weak forms and sentence stress in past modal structures.
Procedure (39-49 minutes)
Procedure: 1. T shows the pictures from the SB (the sequence showing Eleanor, her mother, the doctor, and the hotel). 2. T asks the class: "What do you think is happening in these pictures?" "What do you think happened to the woman in the orange dress?" 3. Ss share ideas in open class; teacher accepts all predictions without confirming. ICQs: Are we reading or just discussing? Just discussing.
2a. Mini Vocabulary (2–3 min) (from the SB “mini-dictionary” box) Procedure: 1. T displays 4 essential words from the SB box: conspiracy – mental asylum – hotel register – trace someone 2. T: "Check these quickly in your mini-dictionary." 3. Ss check individually; T provides a SHORT definition only if absolutely necessary. ICQs: Do I explain the words? No. Do YOU check them? Yes. 2b. Listening for Gist (3–4 min) Procedure: 1. T: “Listen for the main idea. Don’t worry about details.” 2. T plays Audio T9.3 Part A from SB. 3. Ss answer SB gist question via Google Form: What is the main problem in the story? A mysterious disappearance. 4. Quick OCFB. 2c. Listening for Detail (7–8 min) Procedure: 1. T: “Now listen again and answer the detail questions.” 2. Ss answer SB detail questions (a–e) through Google Forms: Why did they leave India? What did the manager say? Why did she call the doctor? Where did the doctor send her? What happened when she returned? 3. Pair check → OCFB. Interaction: Ss individually → T–Ss
Procedure: 1. T shows three example sentences from the SB listening: "The hotel manager must have lied to Eleanor." "Her mother might have gone to another room." "The doctor could have been involved.” Meaning (guided discovery) 2. CCQs: Is this about the past? Yes. Is she sure? (must have) Yes. Is it possible? (might/could have) Yes. Is it impossible? (can’t have if it appears) Yes. Form 3. T highlights: modal + have + past participle (Ss underline the pattern in the example sentences.) Pronunciation + Weak Forms 4. T models and drills: must’ve lied might’ve gone could’ve been Sentence Stress (“stress words”) 5. T shows stress on the participle (SB model): must have LIED might have GONE 6. Ss repeat chorally → individually. ICQs: Is the stress on the modal? No. Is this about the past? Yes.
Procedure: 1. T shares a Google Form with 6 multiple-choice SB-based sentences: Eleanor ___ misunderstood the doctor. The staff ___ moved her mother. The manager ___ told the truth. The doctor ___ been involved. Eleanor ___ gone to the wrong room. They ___ hidden something. 2. Ss choose the correct modal. 3. Pair-check → brief OCFB. ICQs: Do you choose one answer? Yes.
Procedure: 1. T puts Ss in pairs (breakout rooms). 2. In pairs, Ss discuss these prompts (SB-related): Why do you think the mother disappeared? What might the hotel staff have done? What could the doctor have done behind the scenes? 3. Requirement: use at least 3 past modals. 4. T monitors and notes errors/good language. 5. Back in main room: share 2–3 theories. 6. DEC (2 minutes): T highlights good sentences + corrects common errors. ICQs: Do you need to use past modals? Yes. Do you need to invent a full story or just theories? Just theories.
